Biomarkers for joint ailments and uses thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to biomarkers that are associated with joint disorders, and methods of using the biomarkers diagnose joint ailments, monitor the progression of joint ailments, determine when treatments is indicated, and monitor the efficiency of treatment. Also provided are methods for treating joint ailments, which comprise administering chelated trace minerals to animals diagnosed with or predisposed to having joint ailments.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/816,766, filed Mar. 12, 2020, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/817,121, filed Mar. 12, 2019, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to biomarkers that are associated with joint disorders and uses thereof.

BACKGROUND

Lameness has been identified as a welfare issue in all livestock species that leads to reduction in productivity and profitability of the farm. The incidence of locomotion disorders has been associated with hoof and limb lesions, neurological disorders, metabolic and infectious disorders and mechanical and structural problems. The incidence of lameness can vary from 5 to 40% in sows and dairy cows, and has been associated with lower reproduction performance, intake, longevity, and increased mortality. After reproductive problems, lameness is the most common reason for sows and dairy cows resulting in premature removal from the herd. Causes of lameness have been mostly associated with osteochondrosis in bone joints, however this is difficult to identify in live animals. Visual gait lameness scores are commonly used to identify lameness in production animals (pigs, cows and chickens). However, this subjective scoring system lacks sensitivity and consistency among scorers and leads to delayed detection of lameness. Earlier detection of lameness improves the opportunity for resolution with nutritional programs. Thus, there is a need for accurate, objective methodologies that will enable earlier identification of lameness. Furthermore, solutions are needed for reducing severity and incidence of lameness such as nutritional intervention.

SUMMARY

One aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for treating or preventing a joint ailment in an animal, the method comprising (a) collecting a blood sample from the animal; (b) determining the level of at least one biomarker present in the blood sample, the biomarker being chosen from osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-1), procollagen type II C-terminal propeptide (P2CP), C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-2), type II collagen (C2C), or combination thereof; (c) performing an analysis of the level of the at least one biomarker to determine whether the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment, wherein the analysis includes comparing the level of the at least one biomarker in the blood sample to joint ailment-positive and/or joint ailment-negative reference levels of the at least one biomarker in order to determine if the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment; and (d) administering an effective amount of a metal chelate to the animal if the animal is determined to have or to be predisposed to having a joint ailment.

Other aspects and iterations of the disclosure are described in more detail below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 presents the P2CP concentrations from the four treatments (Healthy ITM, Healthy MTX, Lame ITM, Lame MTX) in the naturally occurring lameness model.

FIG. 2 presents a time-course of visual gait scores following urate injection to induce acute lameness. Presented are the gait scores for urate-injected animals fed MTX or ITM for two months prior to the injection.

FIG. 3A presents a time-course of serum levels of C2C in urate-injected animals. FIG. 3B plots a time-course of serum levels of CTX2 in urate-injected animals. FIG. 3C presents a time-course of serum levels of osteocalcin in urate-injected animals previously fed MTX or ITM.

FIG. 4A presents the average weight borne by the front contralateral leg of MTX and ITM animals over time. FIG. 4B shows the average weight borne by the front ipsilateral leg of MTX and ITM animals over time. FIG. 4C presents the average weight borne by the rear contralateral leg of MTX and ITM animals over time. FIG. 4D shows the average weight borne by the urate-injected leg of MTX and ITM animals over time.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides biomarkers that may be used as objective indicators of joint ailments in animals, e.g., livestock animals. The biomarkers may be used to diagnose joint ailments, monitor the progression of joint ailments, determine when treatment is indicated, and monitor the efficiency of treatment.

(I) Biomarkers

One aspect of the present disclosure encompasses a panel of serum biomarkers associated with joint ailments. The biomarkers are involved with bone and cartilage synthesis and degradation. The biomarkers may be used to distinguish healthy animals from animals with joint ailments (e.g., lame animals), to monitor the progression of joint ailments or joint diseases, or monitor the efficacy of treatment.

One biomarker is osteocalcin. Also known as bone gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein (BGLAP), osteocalcin is a noncollagenous protein hormone found in bone and dentin. Osteocalcin is a marker for bone synthesis.

Another biomarker is C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen or CTX-1, which is a marker for bone degradation or turnover. Type I collagen accounts for about 90% of the organic matrix of bone. CTX-1 relates to bone turnover because it is the portion of the molecule that is cleaved by osteoclasts during bone resorption. CTX1 is a marker for bone degradation.

Still another biomarker is procollagen type II C-terminal propeptide or P2CP, which is a biomarker for cartilage synthesis. Type II collagen is the major organic constituent of cartilage. P2CP is a marker for cartilage synthesis.

A further biomarker is C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen or CTX-2, which is a biomarker for cartilage degradation. Following the degradation of cartilage, fragments of CTX-2 are released into circulation. CTX2 is a marker for cartilage degradation.

Yet another biomarker is type II collagen or C2C, which is a biomarker for cartilage degradation.

Upon the determination of levels of the joint ailment biomarkers in healthy animals and animals with joint ailments (either naturally occurring joint ailments or chemically induced joint ailments), these levels may be correlated with standard indicators of lameness or joint ailments to establish biomarker reference levels in healthy animals and animal with joint ailments/lameness. The ratio of synthesis/degradation (P2CP/C2C, P2CP/CTX2, osteocalcin/CTX1) may be associated with lameness.

Standard indicators of lameness or joint ailments include visual gait scores and force plate tests. Gait or locomotion of animals is observed and scored. Gait may be scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from “0” for animals with a normal gait to “4” for animals that are reluctant to walk and bear weight on one or more legs. Force plates may be used to measure the weight of each forelimb, wherein differences suggest that the animal is favoring one limb. By correlating biomarker levels with visual lames/joint ailments standards, reference levels for healthy and lame animals may be established.

(II) Methods for Diagnosing Joint Ailments and/or Monitoring Progression of Joint Ailments

Another aspect of the present disclosure provides methods for diagnosing joint ailments in animals and/or monitoring the progression of joint ailments in animals. For example, the methods may be used to distinguish between healthy animals and animals with joint ailments, and if an animal has a joint ailment, the progression of the ailment may be monitored. The methods comprise (a) collecting a blood sample from the animal, (b) determining the level of at least one of the biomarkers disclosed herein that is present in the blood sample; and (c) performing an analysis of the level of the at least one biomarker to determine whether the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment, wherein the analysis includes comparing the levels of the at least one biomarker in the blood sample to joint ailment-positive and/or joint ailment-negative reference levels of the at least one biomarker in order to determine if the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment and/or monitoring the progression of joint ailments in animals known to have joint problems.

Joint Ailments

As used herein, “joint ailments” refer to diseases or disorders of joints or joint tissues. Joint tissues include bone and connective tissue, i.e., cartilage, tendons, and ligaments. Joint ailments include arthritis or osteoarthritis, which are degenerative joint diseases or disorders due to the gradual deterioration of the articular cartilage within one or more the joints. Arthritis is a general description for any condition that causes inflammation in the joints. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the joints. Other joint ailments include osteochondrosis, gouty arthritis, bursitis, tenosynovitis, epicondylitis, synovitis, ankylosing spondylitis, Sjogren's syndrome, psoriatic arthritis, and Lyme disease. Some joint disorders may arise due to hoof or foot pad diseases or disorders.

Step (a)

The first step of the method comprises collecting a blood sample from the animal. Various methods of collecting blood, urine or synovial fluid are known in the art. Generally, a method of collecting blood comprises accessing the blood using a skin-piercing element and collecting the blood therein into some type of a collection device. Accessing the blood may also involve the use of a fluid pathway, a capillary channel (e.g., a capillary tube), a fluid transfer medium (e.g., a hydrophilic porous material), or some kind of mechanical or vacuum means in conjunction with the skin-piercing element. Generally speaking, the sample collection method preferably maintains the integrity of the sample such that abundance values for each molecular feature can be accurately measured. A blood sample may be a whole blood sample, a plasma sample, or a serum sample.

Step (b)

The second step of the method comprises determining the level of at least one biomarker present in the blood sample. A variety of method may be used to determine the level or concentration of the biomarker(s). The biomarker may be detected and quantified using an antibody-based detection method. For example, the level of the biomarker may be determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The ELISA may be a direct ELISA, a sandwich ELISA, a competitive ELISA, or a reverse ELISA. The detection method may be optical (i.e., colorimetric or fluorometric) or electrochemical. In specific embodiments, the biomarker(s) may be detected using a sandwich ELISA with colorimetric detection.

On other embodiments, the antibody-based detection method may comprise protein immunoprecipitation, immunoelectrophoresis, Western blotting, or protein immunostaining. In still other embodiments, the biomarker(s) levels may be quantitated using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry (LC/MS).

Step (c)

The next step of the method comprises performing an analysis of the level of the at least one biomarker to determine whether the animal is healthy, is predisposed or likely to develop a joint ailment, or has a joint ailment. The analysis comprises comparing the level of the at least one biomarker in the blood sample to joint ailment-positive and/or joint ailment-negative reference levels of the at least one biomarker. If the level of the at least one biomarker falls within the range of joint ailment-negative reference levels, then the animal is healthy and does not have a joint ailment. If the level of the at least one biomarker falls within the range of joint ailment-positive reference levels, then the animal has a joint ailment. The severity of the joint ailment may be estimated based upon the level of the at least one biomarker. The progression of the joint ailment may be monitored by comparing the level of the at least one biomarker over time.

In some embodiments, the levels of two biomarkers may be determined. For example, the levels of osteocalcin and CTX1 may be determined and/or the ratio of osteocalcin/CTX1 may be determined. Alternatively, the levels of P2CP and C2C may be determined and/or the ratio of P2CP/C2C may be determined. In other embodiments, the levels of three biomarkers may be determined. In additional embodiments, the levels of four biomarkers may be determined. In still other embodiments, the levels of all five biomarkers may be determined.

Animals

Suitable animals include, but are not limited to, livestock animals, companion animals, lab animals, and zoological animals. In specific embodiments, the animal may be a livestock animal. Non-limiting examples of suitable livestock animals may include pigs, cows, poultry, goats, sheep, llamas, alpacas, aquatic animals, etc. In exemplary embodiments, the animal may be a pig, e.g., a sow. In other embodiments, the animal may be a dairy cow.

In other embodiments, the animal may be a companion animal. Non-limiting examples of companion animals may include pets such as dogs, cats, horses, rabbits, birds, or rodents (e.g. mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs). In yet other embodiments, the animal may be a zoological animal. As used herein, a “zoological animal” refers to an animal that may be found in a zoo. Such animals may include non-human primates, large cats, wolves, bears, hippos, kangaroos, etc. In still other embodiments, the animal may be a laboratory animal. Non-limiting examples of a laboratory animal may include rodents, canines, felines, and non-human primates.

(III) Methods for Treating or Preventing Joint Ailments

Another aspect of the present disclosure provides methods for treating or preventing joint aliments in animals. The methods may also be used to monitor the efficacy of the treatment method, wherein the treatment method may be modified accordingly. The methods comprise (a) collecting a blood sample from the animal, (b) determining the level of at least one of the biomarkers disclosed herein that is present in the blood sample; (c) performing an analysis of the level of the at least one biomarker to determine whether the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment, wherein the analysis includes comparing the levels of the at least one biomarker in the blood sample to joint ailment-positive and/or joint ailment-negative reference levels of the at least one biomarker in order to determine if the animal has or is predisposed to having a joint ailment; and (d) administering an effective amount of a metal chelate to the animal if the animal is determined to have or to be predisposed to having a joint ailment.

Steps (a), (b), and (c) of the method are as described above in section (II), as are suitable joint ailments and animals.

Step (d)

If, at step (c), the animal is determined to have or to be predisposed to having a joint ailment, the next step comprises administering an effective amount of a metal chelate to the animal.

The metal chelate comprises at least one ligand and at least one metal ion. The ligand may be an amino acid, a hydroxy acid (e.g., alpha hydroxy acid), an organic acid, a sugar alcohol, protein, protein hydrolysate (e.g., soy protein hydrolysate), polysaccharide, or polynucleic acid.

In some embodiments, the ligand may be an amino acid. Suitable amino acid derivatives include alanate, arginate, asparaginate, aspartate, cysteinate, glutaminate, glutamate, histidinate, homocysteinate, isoleucinate, lysinate, methionate, phenylalinate, prolinate, serinate, threonate, typtophanate, tyrosinate, and valinate.

In other embodiments, the ligand may be an organic acid. Non-limiting examples of suitable organic acid moieties include adipate, ascorbate, caprylate, citrate, fulvate, furmarate, glucoheptonate, gluconate, glutarate, glycerophosphate, humate, lactate, ketoglutarate, malate, malonate, orotate, oxlate, pantothenate, picolinate, pidolate, sebacate, succinate, and tartrate.

In still other embodiments, the ligand may be a sugar alcohol. Suitable sugar alcohols include, without limit, sorbitol, mannitol, xylitol, lactitol, isomalt, maltitol, erythritol, and hydrogenated starch hydrolysates (HSH).

In specific embodiments, the ligand is a compound of Formula (I).

wherein R¹ is methyl or ethyl and n is 1 or 2. In exemplary embodiments, R¹ is methyl and n is 2 and the compound of Formula (I) is methionine hydroxy analog (or 2-hydroxy-4-(thiomethyl)butanoic acid, HMTBA).

The at least one metal ion may be calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, germanium, iron, lithium, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, potassium, sodium, rubidium, tin, vanadium, zinc, or combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the at least one metal ion may be calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, sodium, zinc, or combination thereof. In specific embodiments, the at least one metal ion may be copper, manganese, zinc, or combination thereof.

The ratio of the at least one ligand and the at least one metal ion may vary in the metal chelate. For example, the ratio of ligand to metal may range from 1:1 to about 3:1 or higher. In embodiments in which the metal ion is divalent, the ratio of ligand to metal may be 2:1.

In particular embodiments, the metal chelate may comprise methionine hydroxy analog copper (i.e., MHA-Cu to (HMTBA)₂-Cu), methionine hydroxy analog manganese (i.e., MHA-Mn or (HMTBA)₂-Mn), methionine hydroxy analog zinc (i.e., MHA-Zn or (HMTBA)₂-Zn), or a combination of any or all of the foregoing (which are available from Novus International, Inc., under the tradename MINTREX®).

The effective amount of the metal chelate that is administered to the animal can and will vary, depending for example upon the type and age of the animal and/or the severity of the joint ailment. Persons skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate amount.

In general, the metal chelate is included in the feed rations of the animal. Feed rations typically are formulated to meet the nutrient and energy demands of a particular animal. The nutrient and energy content of many common animal feed ingredients have been measured and are available to the public. The National Research Council has published books that contain tables of common feed ingredients and their respective measured nutrient and energy content. Additionally, estimates of nutrient and maintenance energy requirements are provided for animals of different life stages, age, sex, or use. This information can be utilized by one skilled in the art to estimate the nutritional and maintenance energy requirements of animal and determine the nutrient and energy content of animal feed ingredients.

EXAMPLES

The following examples illustrate various embodiments of the present disclosure.

Example 1: Protocol Description

Two different models of lameness (naturally-occurring and chemically-induced) were evaluated in this study. In both models, objective measures of lameness (serum biomarkers, force-plate, thermal imaging) were compared to visual gait scoring. The study design was a 2×2 factorial arrangement consisting of two dietary treatments (chelated trace minerals vs inorganic trace minerals) and two populations of pigs (lame vs healthy non-lame). The chelated trace minerals (MTX) comprised methionine hydroxy analog (MHA) chelate (i.e., MHA-Cu, MHA-Mn, and/or MHA-Zn) and the inorganic trace minerals (ITM) comprised mineral sulfates.

Four groups of pigs (8 lame/8 non-lame per group) for a total of 32 lame/32 non-lame/64 total were fed the dietary treatments for a period of two months. For the naturally-occurring portion of the trial (Example 2), lameness measurements were taken at baseline (d0), month 1 (d28) and month 2 (d53). At the end of the 2-month period, only the healthy animals (n=8 per group; 4 on MTX and 4 on ITM) were then injected with sodium urate crystals (10 mg/mL and 0.2 mL injection volume) into the right rear distal interphalangeal joint (Example 3).

Most methods used for gait scoring are based on uneven or asymmetrical weight-bearing. As shown in Table 1, a 5-point scale (0-4) was used, with 4 being most severe.

TABLE 1 Scoring System for Subjective Lameness Evaluation Lameness Score Description 0 Animal moves freely and used all 4 limbs and feet evenly 1 Animal shows weight-shifting activities away from affected limb upon standing but show no lameness of limping when walking 2 Animal obviously shifts weight away from affected limb when standing and shows limping or adaptive behavior when walking (e.g., head bob, quickened step on affected limb) 3 Animal is reluctant to stand and/or walk, obvious limp and adaptive behaviors when walking 4 Animal is non-weight bearing on the affected limb when either standing or walking

The force-plate analysis quantifies the amount of force each limb applies to four separate loading cells. Two data points per second were captured over a 2-minute time duration. A lame animal typically bears less weight on the limb that is painful or structurally unsound.

Thermal imaging measures the heat emitted from a body surface as infrared radiation. Studies of clinical disease have shown that a difference greater than 1° C. between two of the same anatomical regions indicate an abnormality such as inflammation. The high degree of symmetry between the left and right side of an animal is a valuable asset in the diagnosis of a unilateral problem associated with lameness. Thus, these objective measures of lameness should correlate to the visual gait score, which is also based on asymmetrical weight-bearing.

All statistical analyses were performed with SAS using the pig as the experimental unit. All lameness measurements were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the main effects of dietary treatment and healthy vs lame plus their interactions; differences in front vs rear limbs were also compared. In addition, data were also evaluated using a mixed model including day, lameness, dietary treatment, bodyweight, group and gender. Day was included as a repeated measure using an autoregressive covariance structure, and data collected the day before the start of the study were included as covariates (for force-plate data only).

Pearson correlation coefficients and regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between objective measurements vs the gait score.

Example 2. Biomarker Levels in Healthy and Naturally-Occurring Lame Animals

Serum biomarkers were measured at day 0, day 25 and day 53 (2 months) in healthy (H) and lame (L) animals (n=48). The levels of serum CTX1, osteocalcin (OC), C2C, P2CP, and CTX2 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the procedures described in the commercial kits (e.g., MyBiosource). The results are presented in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Biomarker Levels in Healthy and Naturally-Occurring Lame Animals P2CP/C2C OC/CTX1 P2CP/CTX2 ratio ratio ratio CTX1 OC P2CP CTX2 C2C ITM 1.32 15.2 1.08 15.45 161.5 7.28 7.41 14.09 MTX 1.04 15.2 1.27 16.58 163.2 8.28 6.95 14.63 SEM 0.14 0.98 0.06 0.54 3.70 0.28 0.24 0.47 Group <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 Gender 0.5349 0.7119 0.0007 0.1197 0.9446 0.0047 0.0020 0.0330 H or L 0.0890 0.8477 0.0908 0.0073 0.8430 0.2020 0.0002 0.0176 Trt¹ 0.1686 0.9498 0.0267 0.1398 0.7454 0.0114 0.1694 0.4124 H or L*Trt 0.2736 0.4433 0.1480 0.1134 0.1397 0.9727 0.7631 0.5731 Day 0.3520 0.0773 0.7891 <.0001 0.2912 0.9771 0.4635 0.4111 Trt*day 0.4409 0.5765 0.4150 0.3543 0.9514 0.8792 0.3368 0.2474 P2CP/CTX2 OC/CTX1 H or L ratio CTX2 C2C Day ratio CTX1 Healthy (H) 1.25 6.53 13.57 0 13.0 18.3 Lame (L) 1.11 7.82 15.15 28 16.3 14.1 SEM 0.06 0.24 0.47 56 16.3 15.5 % delta 11.2 16.5 10.4 SEM 1.2 0.66 ¹Treatment (ITM or MTX).

These results reveal that the biomarkers were able to distinguish between healthy vs lame, as well as demonstrate beneficial effects of MTX. Cartilage degradative markers, CTX2 (P=0.0002) and C2C (P=0.0176) were elevated and the ratio of cartilage synthesis/degradation (P2CP/CTX2; P=0.0908) was decreased in lame animals (Table 2). Dietary treatment differences were also observed: cartilage synthesis biomarker (P2CP, P=0.0114) and the ratio of cartilage synthesis/degradation (P2CP/CTX2, P=.0267) were increased with MTX (Table 2). As shown in FIG. 1, there was not a diet (ITM vs MTX) * healthy vs lame interaction (P=0.9727). This indicates that MTX treatment is increasing cartilage synthesis in both healthy and lame pigs and may have preventative joint health effects.

Example 3: Urate-Induced Lameness

At the end of two months, sodium urate crystals (10 mg/mL and 0.2 mL injection volume) were injected into the right rear distal interphalangeal joint of healthy pigs from each of the four groups. Thus, a total of 16 pigs for MTX, and 16 for ITM were evaluated during the urate-induced portion of the trial. Data collection, relative to time of urate injection, occurred at baseline (d -1/d 53), 6 and 12 hr (d0/d54), 24 hr (d1/55), 48 hr (d2/56), 72 hr (d3/57) and 144 hr (d6/60) post-injection.

As shown in FIG. 2, pigs fed MTX had lower gait scores (Main effect of diet: P=0.0057). In addition, gait scores at peak lameness (12hr post-urate injection P=0.0244, 48hr post-urate injection P=0.0155) were lower in pigs fed MTX. Since the pigs had been on the dietary treatments (MTX vs ITM) for 2 months prior to urate-injections, these findings suggest that MTX supplementation lowers the severity of urate-induced lameness.

The time-course for the serum biomarkers after urate administration is shown in FIG. 3A-3C. Biomarker changes closely paralleled the changes in gait score. For example, cartilage degradative biomarkers (C2C and CTX2), similar to gait score, peaked 12 hr post-urate injection (FIG. 3A, 3B), bone synthesis biomarker (osteocalcin) peaked between 12 and 48 hr post-urate injection (FIG. 3C). Similar to gait scores, after 72 hr (if not sooner) these three biomarkers (C2C, CTX2, osteocalcin) returned to baseline or plateaued relative to initial concentrations.

Tables 3-5 present the biomarker levels after urate administration (without covariate). There were numerical or significant effects of time (Hr) for C2C (P=0.0853), CTX2 (P=0.1014), and osteocalcin (OC, P=0.0011) as indicated in FIG. 3A-3C. Beneficial effects of MTX were also observed; bone synthesis biomarker (OC, P=0.0700) and the ratio of bone synthesis/degradation (OC/CTX1; P=0.0470) were increased and the ratio of cartilage synthesis/degradation (P2CP/C2C; P=0.0990) was decreased with MTX.

TABLE 3 Biomarker Levels as Affected by Urate-induced Lameness P2CP/C2C P2CP/CTX2 OC/CTX1 ratio ratio ratio C2C CTX2 P2CP OC CTX1 ITM 1.67 1.11 11.13 9.72 11.10 6.67 139.1 18.6 MTX 0.89 1.17 13.70 10.33 11.42 6.77 145.3 18.9 SEM 0.34 0.06 0.92 0.42 0.36 0.17 2.5 0.57 Grp <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 Gender 0.5818 0.0835 0.4405 0.0053 <0.0001 0.0011 0.9614 0.6233 Trt 0.0990 0.4955 0.0470 0.2960 0.5168 0.6921 0.0700 0.6233 Hr 0.7260 0.1063 0.3021 0.0853 0.1014 0.3398 0.0011 0.3205 Hr*Trt 0.6260 0.426 0.3950 0.7466 0.9413 0.9822 0.8181 0.8439

TABLE 4 Time Course of Select Biomarkers Hour C2C CTX2 OC OC (ITM) OC (MTX) 0 9.73 11.17 139.1 133 145.2 6 10.15 12.27 137.5 133.0 142 12 12.84 13.06 147.2 146.3 148.2 24 9.48 10.93 153.0 152.2 153.8 48 9.23 10.49 151.2 143.2 159.1 72 9.58 10.39 136.5 135.4 137.7 144 9.15 10.52 130.95 130.3 131.6 SEM 0.8 0.59 4.0 4.0 4.0 P value 0.0853 0.1014 0.0011

TABLE 5 Gender and Biomarker Levels P2CP/CTX2 Gender C2C CTX2 P2CP ratio Barrow 10.8 12.6 7.13 1.07 Gilt 9.2 9.6 6.31 1.21 SEM 0.42 0.36 0.17 0.06 P value 0.0053 <0.0001 0.0011 0.0835

Although it was predicted that both bone and cartilage synthesis/degradation would increase with MTX, based on correlation analyses, bone and cartilage syntheses were negatively correlated (Table 6 and opposite slopes for osteocalcin (+) and P2CP (−) in Table 7). Similarly, a negative direction between bone and cartilage synthesis was reported by Billinghurst et al. (Am J Vet Res, 2004,65(2): 143-50) in foals with osteochondrosis (e.g., decreased osteocalcin and increased P2CP).

TABLE 6 P2CP is Negatively Correlated to Osteocalcin Bone Cartilage synthesis synthesis Correlation P- Model marker marker coefficient value Urate-induced Osteocalcin P2CP −0.2898 0.0007 Naturally- Osteocalcin P2CP −0.3813 0.0116 occurring

TABLE 7 Biomarkers are Correlated to Gait Score Expected Marker Direction Slope P-value Degradative CTX2 ↑ +0.9 NS C2C ↑ +1.4 0.0072 CTXI ↑ +5.9 <0.0001 Synthesis P2CP ↑↓ −0.38 0.0914 Osteocalcin ↑↓ +26.1 0.0070 Ratio of Synthesis/ Degradative P2CP/CTX2 ↓ −0.27 0.0010 P2CP/C2C ↓ −0.87 0.0716 Osteocalcin/CTXI ↓ −4.8 0.0138

As shown in Table 7, for the urate-induced lameness model, correlation and regression analyses demonstrated that biomarkers were significantly correlated to lameness or gait score. Out of the 8 biomarkers evaluated, five were significantly correlated at P<0.05; two at P<0.10; only one was not significant. Furthermore, the slopes were in the expected direction: positive for cartilage and bone degradative markers, negative for the ratio of synthesis/degradation in bone and cartilage and mixed for synthetic markers (positive slope for osteocalcin; negative slope for P2CP).

Force-plate analyses are presented in FIG. 4A-4D. These analyses also demonstrated beneficial effects of MTX on weight-bearing. For the urate-injected foot (right rear, RR), higher weight-bearing occurred at all timepoints post-injection in MTX animals (FIG. 4D; significantly higher at D+3 and D+6). Higher weight-bearing also occurred on the contralateral rear leg in MTX animals (FIG. 4C; higher at D+1 and D+2 post-injection). These findings suggest that the lameness was less severe in pigs fed MTX, which agreed with the gait score findings (FIG. 2; gait score was less severe for MTX-fed pigs).

Taken together, serum biomarkers for cartilage degradation (C2C, CTX2) were increased and bone synthesis biomarker (osteocalcin) were altered in lame pigs. Those biomarkers can be used objectively to measure lameness in pigs. Feeding MTX improved metabolism of bone and cartilage by increasing both bone synthesis (osteocalcin) over degradation (osteocalcin/CTX1 ratio) and cartilage synthesis (P2CP) over degradation (P2CP/CTX2 ratio). In summary, lameness increased cartilage degradation biomarkers and altered bone synthesis biomarkers, feeding MTX improved bone and cartilage synthesis over degradation, therefore reducing lameness. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for treating or reducing the severity of lameness due to inflammation in a pig, the method comprising: (a) determining the level of a ratio of two biomarkers in a blood sample from the pig, wherein the ratio of two biomarkers is selected from OC/CTX1, P2CP/C2C, and P2CP/CTX2; (b) comparing the level of the ratio of the pig to a non-lame pig having a gait score of about 0 on a 5 point scale to determine whether the pig is lame, wherein the pig is lame if the level of one or more of the ratios is decreased compared to the non-lame pig; (c) administering an effective amount of metal chelate to the pig if the pig is determined to be lame, wherein the metal chelate results in the at least one ratio increasing and a reduction of the lameness.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein in step (b) the level of a single biomarker selected from C2C, CTX1, CTX2, OC and P2CP may be determined.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) comprises an antibody-based detection method.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the metal chelate comprises at least one metal ion and at least one ligand, wherein the at least one ligand is an amino acid, hydroxy acid, organic acid, sugar alcohol, protein, protein hydrolysate, polysaccharide, or polynucleic acid.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one metal ion is calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, sodium, zinc, or combination thereof.
 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one ligand is a compound of Formula (I):

wherein: R¹ is methyl or ethyl; and n is 1 or
 2. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein R¹ is methyl and n is
 2. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the at least one metal ion is copper, manganese, zinc, or combination thereof.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the pig is at risk for developing lameness due to inflammation.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the pig is lame and has a gait score of about 2 or more on a 5 point scale.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the metal chelate reduces symptoms of lameness compared to administering an inorganic mineral to a comparable pig afflicted with lameness due to inflammation.
 12. A method for treating or preventing lameness due to inflammation in a pig, the method comprising administering a metal chelate to the pig, wherein the metal chelate reduces symptoms of lameness compared to administering an inorganic mineral to a comparable pig afflicted with lameness due to inflammation.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the metal chelate comprises at least one metal ion and at least one ligand, wherein the at least one ligand is an amino acid, hydroxy acid, organic acid, sugar alcohol, protein, protein hydrolysate, polysaccharide, or polynucleic acid.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the at least one metal ion is calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, nickel, potassium, sodium, zinc, or combination thereof.
 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the at least one ligand is a compound of Formula (I):

wherein: R¹ is methyl or ethyl; and n is 1 or
 2. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein R¹ is methyl and n is
 2. 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the at least one metal ion is copper, manganese, zinc, or combination thereof.
 18. The method of claim 12, wherein the pig is at risk for developing lameness due to inflammation.
 19. The method of claim 12, wherein the pig has been diagnosed as lame.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the pig has a gait score of about 2 or more on a 5 point scale. 